Wordpress Cache-Enabler Plugin Fastcgi_cache + Cache Enabler?

See https://community.centminmod.com/th...l-vs-centmin-sh-menu-option-22-install.15435/. Not really needed as fastcgi_cache is a full page cache as is KeyCDN cache enabler. You don't need to do full page caching twice.

 

still in private testing

 

definitely on the books to test once i get centmin.sh menu option 22's wordpress installer's fastcgi_cache full page caching nailed down testing wise. But from past testing fastcgi_cache php-fpm caching will beat any wordpress plugin full page caching like wp super cache due to the nature of respective caches

fastcgi_cache php-fpm operates at nginx level so cached entries don't touch php-fpm and served from nginx disk mapped memory cache.

wp super cache and w3 total cache would operate at wordpress plugin level so still needs to be processed through php-fpm. keycdn cache enabler on non-centmin mod setups would be the same. However, centmin mod centmin.sh menu option 22 wordpress installer configures keycdn cache enabler with advanced caching which ends up bypassing php-fpm and works at nginx level like fastcgi_cache php-fpm. This means you can't compare Centmin Mod installed and configured keycdn cache enabler with other non-centmin mod installations's keycdn cache enabler.

As such I suspect Centmin Mod menu option 22 wordpress installed keycdn cache enabler full page cache to be very close to performance of menu option 22 wordpress installed fastcgi_cache php-fpm setups This is probably why when tested Centmin Mod wordpress keycdn cache enabler versus cyberpanel Litespeed cache tests it was such a closer race compared to benchmarks Litespeed has shown against their Nginx benchmarks (which is non-Centmin Mod nginx which already would be slower than Centmin Mod Nginx anyway) WebPerf - PageSpeed - Wordpress Webpagetest PageSpeed Comparison for CyberPanel OpenLiteSpeed vs Centmin Mod LEMP