Benchmarks GoDaddy Cheap VPS Benchmark

KlueMaster · Jun 14, 2019

I had purchased a VPS with following config from GoDaddy for ~$150 for 2 years:

1GB RAM
40GB SSD
1vCPU
2TB transfer

Now, the renewal is approaching and they are asking ~$350 for 2 years to renew it, while offering a fresh VPS with 2GB RAM @ ~$180 for 2 years, it's time to look at alternatives.

However, I thought it's a good idea to benchmark the performance so as to make a wise decision. Here are the results.

Code:

-------------------------------------------
centminmodbench.sh 0.9.9
http://bench.centminmod.com
written by: George Liu (eva2000)
http://centminmod.com
-------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------
System Information
-------------------------------------------

2.6.32-042stab133.2

CentOS release 6.9 (Final)

Centmin Mod 
----------------------------------------------
CPU: 24 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
x86_64

CPU Flags
 fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good eagerfpu xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf cpuid_faulting pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm ida arat epb pln pts dtherm invpcid_single ssbd pti retpoline ibrs ibpb tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid cqm xsaveopt cqm_llc cqm_occup_llc flush_l1d

----------------------------------------------
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:          1024        489        534          2          0        361
Low:          1024        489        534
High:            0          0          0
-/+ buffers/cache:        127        896
Swap:            0          0          0

----------------------------------------------
Filesystem         Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/ploop18653p1   40G  6.7G   31G  18% /
none               512M  4.0K  512M   1% /dev
none               512M     0  512M   0% /dev/shm

Code:

-------------------------------------------
disk ioping tests
-------------------------------------------


Running IOPing I/O benchmark...

IOPing I/O: ./ioping -c 10 .
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=1 time=120 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=2 time=163 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=3 time=120 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=4 time=145 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=5 time=160 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=6 time=96 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=7 time=73 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=8 time=100 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=9 time=141 us
4.0 KiB from . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1): request=10 time=137 us

--- . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.0 s, 8.0 k iops, 31.1 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 73 us / 125 us / 163 us / 27 us

IOPing seek rate: ./ioping -RD .

--- . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1) ioping statistics ---
51.0 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 18.1 k iops, 70.7 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 43 us / 55 us / 5.9 ms / 48 us

IOPing sequential: ./ioping -RL .

--- . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1) ioping statistics ---
11.6 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 4.5 k iops, 1.1 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 161 us / 223 us / 16.9 ms / 365 us

IOPing cached: ./ioping -RC .

--- . (ext4 /dev/ploop18653p1) ioping statistics ---
1.9 M requests completed in 3.0 s, 678.5 k iops, 2.6 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0 us / 1 us / 464 us / 1 us

Code:

-------------------------------------------
disk DD tests
-------------------------------------------

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.97514 s, 270 MB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.51171 s, 710 MB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.3166 s, 324 MB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.64164 s, 190 MB/s

Code:

-------------------------------------------
disk FIO tests
-------------------------------------------


Running FIO benchmark...

FIO_VERSION = fio-2.0.9

FIO random reads: 
randomreads: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 1 process
randomreads: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)

randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2418: Fri Jun 14 12:28:15 2019
  read : io=1024.3MB, bw=254200KB/s, iops=63549 , runt=  4126msec
  cpu          : usr=10.72%, sys=64.07%, ctx=167488, majf=0, minf=88
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=254199KB/s, minb=254199KB/s, maxb=254199KB/s, mint=4126msec, maxt=4126msec

FIO random writes: 
randomwrites: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 1 process

randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2422: Fri Jun 14 12:28:22 2019
  write: io=1024.3MB, bw=151281KB/s, iops=37820 , runt=  6933msec
  cpu          : usr=4.62%, sys=25.88%, ctx=2398, majf=0, minf=24
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=151280KB/s, minb=151280KB/s, maxb=151280KB/s, mint=6933msec, maxt=6933msec

Code:

-------------------------------------------
ramdisk DD tests - memory bandwidth
-------------------------------------------

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=128k count=1k conv=fdatasync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 0.094653 s, 1.4 GB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=8k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 0.17565 s, 764 MB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=128k count=1k oflag=dsync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 0.0731298 s, 1.8 GB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=8k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 0.0972908 s, 1.4 GB/s

Code:

-------------------------------------------
ramdisk ioping tests - memory bandwidth
-------------------------------------------


Running IOPing I/O ramdisk benchmark...

IOPing I/O: ./ioping -c 10 .
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=1 time=3 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=2 time=5 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=3 time=5 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=4 time=5 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=5 time=4 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=6 time=5 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=7 time=6 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=8 time=5 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=9 time=6 us
4.0 KiB from . (tmpfs tmpfs): request=10 time=8 us

--- . (tmpfs tmpfs) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.0 s, 192.3 k iops, 751.2 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3 us / 5 us / 8 us / 1 us

IOPing seek rate: ./ioping -R .

--- . (tmpfs tmpfs) ioping statistics ---
597.4 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 635.1 k iops, 2.4 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0 us / 1 us / 560 us / 1 us

IOPing sequential: ./ioping -RL .

--- . (tmpfs tmpfs) ioping statistics ---
22.2 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 13.8 k iops, 3.4 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 49 us / 72 us / 670 us / 14 us

IOPing cached: ./ioping -RC .

--- . (tmpfs tmpfs) ioping statistics ---
1.9 M requests completed in 3.0 s, 695.0 k iops, 2.7 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0 us / 1 us / 411 us / 0 us

Code:

-------------------------------------------
Running bandwidth benchmark...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Download Cachefly: 103MB/s

-------------------------------------------
USA bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Download from Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://speedtest.atlanta.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
Download Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA: 35.1MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://speedtest.dallas.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
Download Linode, Dallas, TX, USA: 59.8MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA (http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
Download Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA: 22.9MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Download Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA: 46.0MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Download Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA: 74.3MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Download Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA: 26.6MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from VersaWeb, Las Vegas, Nevada (http://lg.las1.as53340.net/100MB.test)
Download VersaWeb, Las Vegas, Nevada: 22.2MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from OVH, BHS, Canada (http://bhs.proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
Download OVH, BHS, Canada: 13.3MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Los Angeles, California (http://lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Los Angeles, California: 123MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Seattle, Washington (http://wa-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Seattle, Washington: 52.3MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Dallas, Texas (http://tx-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Dallas, Texas: 76.1MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Chicago, Illinois (http://il-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Chicago, Illinois: 38.2MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Atlanta, Georgia (http://ga-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Atlanta, Georgia: 46.7MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Miami, Florida (http://fl-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Miami, Florida: 40.4MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, New York / New Jersey (http://nj-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, New York / New Jersey: 35.6MB/s

-------------------------------------------
Asia bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Download from Linode, Tokyo, JP (http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin)
Download Linode, Tokyo, JP: 16.7MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Softlayer, Singapore (http://speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Download Softlayer, Singapore: 9.43MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Tokyo, Japan (http://hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Tokyo, Japan: 16.1MB/s

-------------------------------------------
Europe bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Download from Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
Download Linode, London, UK: 11.9MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
Download OVH, Paris, France: 11.7MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
Download SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands: 12.2MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Amsterdam, Netherlands (http://ams-nl-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Amsterdam, Netherlands: 14.6MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, London, UK (http://lon-gb-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, London, UK: 17.0MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Paris, France (http://par-fr-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Paris, France: 15.6MB/s

-------------------------------------------
Australia bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Download from Vultr, Sydney, Australia (http://syd-au-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Download Vultr, Sydney, Australia: 11.3MB/s

Code:

-------------------------------------------
Running Axel multi-threaded bandwidth benchmark...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Axel Download Cachefly: 98.01MB/s

-------------------------------------------
USA bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://speedtest.atlanta.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
Axel Download Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA: 71.07MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://speedtest.dallas.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
Axel Download Linode, Dallas, TX, USA: 109.47MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA (http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin)
Axel Download Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA: 15.81MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Axel Download Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA: 64.51MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Axel Download Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA: 116.94MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Axel Download Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA: 44.12MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from VersaWeb, Las Vegas, Nevada (http://lg.las1.as53340.net/100MB.test)
Axel Download VersaWeb, Las Vegas, Nevada: 73.41MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from OVH, BHS, Canada (http://bhs.proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
Axel Download OVH, BHS, Canada: 20.28MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Los Angeles, California (http://lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Los Angeles, California: 184.92MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Seattle, Washington (http://wa-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Seattle, Washington: 93.81MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Dallas, Texas (http://tx-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Dallas, Texas: 143.59MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Chicago, Illinois (http://il-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Chicago, Illinois: 78.70MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Atlanta, Georgia (http://ga-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Atlanta, Georgia: 39.81MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Miami, Florida (http://fl-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Miami, Florida: 66.48MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, New York / New Jersey (http://nj-us-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, New York / New Jersey: 34.37MB/s

-------------------------------------------
Asia bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Linode, Tokyo, JP (http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin)
Axel Download Linode, Tokyo, JP: 35.31MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Softlayer, Singapore (http://speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Axel Download Softlayer, Singapore: 16.44MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Tokyo, Japan (http://hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Tokyo, Japan: 36.27MB/s

-------------------------------------------
Europe bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
Axel Download Linode, London, UK: 20.46MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
Axel Download OVH, Paris, France: 18.40MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
Axel Download SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands: 19.79MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Amsterdam, Netherlands (http://ams-nl-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Amsterdam, Netherlands: 31.42MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, London, UK (http://lon-gb-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, London, UK: 33.36MB/s
----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Paris, France (http://par-fr-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Paris, France: 33.17MB/s

-------------------------------------------
Australia bandwidth tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Axel Download from Vultr, Sydney, Australia (http://syd-au-ping.vultr.com/vultr.com.100MB.bin)
Axel Download Vultr, Sydney, Australia: 24.42MB/s

Code:

-------------------------------------------
Running ping tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
Pings (cachefly.cachefly.net):
PING vip1.g.edgefly.com (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=9.04 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=9.05 ms
64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=9.05 ms

--- vip1.g.edgefly.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.049/9.051/9.053/0.077 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (syd-au-ping.vultr.com):
PING syd-au-ping.vultr.com (108.61.212.117) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117.vultr.com (108.61.212.117): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=181 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117.vultr.com (108.61.212.117): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=180 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.212.117.vultr.com (108.61.212.117): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=180 ms

--- syd-au-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2182ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 180.900/180.970/181.072/0.073 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com):
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=135 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=135 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=135 ms

--- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2137ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 135.085/135.146/135.222/0.428 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com):
PING lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.219.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.219.200.vultr.com (108.61.219.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=16.2 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.219.200.vultr.com (108.61.219.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=16.3 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.219.200.vultr.com (108.61.219.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=16.3 ms

--- lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2019ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 16.253/16.311/16.351/0.112 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (wa-us-ping.vultr.com):
PING wa-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.194.105) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.194.105.vultr.com (108.61.194.105): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=36.7 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.194.105.vultr.com (108.61.194.105): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=36.8 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.194.105.vultr.com (108.61.194.105): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=36.8 ms

--- wa-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2040ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.796/36.816/36.828/0.157 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (tx-us-ping.vultr.com):
PING tx-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.224.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.224.175.vultr.com (108.61.224.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=24.6 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.224.175.vultr.com (108.61.224.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=24.7 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.224.175.vultr.com (108.61.224.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=24.6 ms

--- tx-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2026ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.657/24.707/24.777/0.188 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (il-us-ping.vultr.com):
PING il-us-ping.vultr.com (107.191.51.12) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 107.191.51.12.vultr.com (107.191.51.12): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=52.7 ms
64 bytes from 107.191.51.12.vultr.com (107.191.51.12): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=52.7 ms
64 bytes from 107.191.51.12.vultr.com (107.191.51.12): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=52.8 ms

--- il-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2055ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.742/52.789/52.836/0.191 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (ga-us-ping.vultr.com):
PING ga-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.193.166) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.193.166.vultr.com (108.61.193.166): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=50.3 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.193.166.vultr.com (108.61.193.166): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=50.4 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.193.166.vultr.com (108.61.193.166): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=50.3 ms

--- ga-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2052ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.340/50.398/50.465/0.264 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (fl-us-ping.vultr.com):
PING fl-us-ping.vultr.com (104.156.244.232) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 104.156.244.232: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=50.3 ms
64 bytes from 104.156.244.232: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=50.3 ms
64 bytes from 104.156.244.232: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=50.3 ms

--- fl-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2052ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.302/50.332/50.363/0.024 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (nj-us-ping.vultr.com):
PING nj-us-ping.vultr.com (108.61.149.182) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.149.182.vultr.com (108.61.149.182): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=62.4 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.149.182.vultr.com (108.61.149.182): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=56.2 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.149.182.vultr.com (108.61.149.182): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=62.4 ms

--- nj-us-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2064ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 56.261/60.405/62.495/2.937 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (fra-de-ping.vultr.com):
PING fra-de-ping.vultr.com (108.61.210.117) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117.vultr.com (108.61.210.117): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=145 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117.vultr.com (108.61.210.117): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=145 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.210.117.vultr.com (108.61.210.117): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=145 ms

--- fra-de-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2147ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 145.532/145.554/145.569/0.015 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (ams-nl-ping.vultr.com):
PING ams-nl-ping.vultr.com (108.61.198.102) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.198.102.vultr.com (108.61.198.102): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=129 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.198.102.vultr.com (108.61.198.102): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=129 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.198.102.vultr.com (108.61.198.102): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=129 ms

--- ams-nl-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2132ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 129.704/129.786/129.855/0.062 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (lon-gb-ping.vultr.com):
PING lon-gb-ping.vultr.com (108.61.196.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.196.101.vultr.com (108.61.196.101): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=133 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.196.101.vultr.com (108.61.196.101): icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=133 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.196.101.vultr.com (108.61.196.101): icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=133 ms

--- lon-gb-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2135ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 133.241/133.307/133.393/0.426 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (par-fr-ping.vultr.com):
PING par-fr-ping.vultr.com (108.61.209.127) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.209.127.vultr.com (108.61.209.127): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.209.127.vultr.com (108.61.209.127): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.209.127.vultr.com (108.61.209.127): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=132 ms

--- par-fr-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2134ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 132.216/132.234/132.253/0.297 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (VersaWeb Las Vegas):
PING 104.143.15.254 (104.143.15.254) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 192.228.109.50 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded
From 192.228.109.50 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded
From 192.228.109.50 icmp_seq=3 Time to live exceeded

--- 104.143.15.254 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 2017ms


----------------------------------------------
Pings (VersaWeb Seattle):
PING 76.164.234.1 (76.164.234.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 76.164.234.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=44.8 ms
64 bytes from 76.164.234.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=44.8 ms
64 bytes from 76.164.234.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=44.8 ms

--- 76.164.234.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2047ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 44.806/44.814/44.821/0.244 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (OVH Canada):
PING bhs.proof.ovh.net (192.99.19.165) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (192.99.19.165): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=81.3 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (192.99.19.165): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=81.3 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (192.99.19.165): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=81.3 ms

--- bhs.proof.ovh.net ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2084ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 81.335/81.345/81.357/0.009 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (10gbps.io Frankfurt):
PING 195.181.174.20 (195.181.174.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 195.181.174.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=141 ms
64 bytes from 195.181.174.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=141 ms
64 bytes from 195.181.174.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=141 ms

--- 195.181.174.20 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2144ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 141.500/141.519/141.543/0.307 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (10gbps.io London):
PING 185.59.221.20 (185.59.221.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 185.59.221.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=122 ms
64 bytes from 185.59.221.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=122 ms
64 bytes from 185.59.221.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=122 ms

--- 185.59.221.20 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2125ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 122.598/122.615/122.648/0.286 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (10gbps.io Paris):
PING 185.93.2.193 (185.93.2.193) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 185.93.2.193: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=169 ms
64 bytes from 185.93.2.193: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=169 ms
64 bytes from 185.93.2.193: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=169 ms

--- 185.93.2.193 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2172ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 169.423/169.487/169.601/0.482 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (10gbps.io Singapore):
PING 203.174.85.38 (203.174.85.38) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- 203.174.85.38 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 11999ms


----------------------------------------------
Pings (10gbps.io Stockholm):
PING 185.76.9.10 (185.76.9.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 185.76.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=159 ms
64 bytes from 185.76.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=159 ms
64 bytes from 185.76.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=159 ms

--- 185.76.9.10 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2162ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.772/159.817/159.852/0.033 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (10gbps.io Moscow):
PING 87.245.204.20 (87.245.204.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 87.245.204.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=174 ms
64 bytes from 87.245.204.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=174 ms
64 bytes from 87.245.204.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=174 ms

--- 87.245.204.20 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2176ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 174.237/174.252/174.263/0.011 ms

----------------------------------------------
Pings (10gbps.io Miami):
PING 195.181.162.195 (195.181.162.195) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 195.181.162.195: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=72.8 ms
64 bytes from 195.181.162.195: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=73.0 ms
64 bytes from 195.181.162.195: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=72.9 ms

--- 195.181.162.195 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2073ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 72.808/72.912/73.024/0.237 ms

Code:

-------------------------------------------
Running mtr tests...
-------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 cachefly.cachefly.net
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.atlanta.linode.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.dallas.linode.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 mirror.us.leaseweb.net
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.tokyo.linode.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 speedtest.london.linode.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 mirror.i3d.net
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 syd-au-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 wa-us-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 tx-us-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 il-us-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 ga-us-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 fl-us-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 nj-us-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 fra-de-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 ams-nl-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 lon-gb-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 par-fr-ping.vultr.com
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 VersaWeb Las Vegas
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 VersaWeb Seattle
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 OVH Canada
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 10gbps.io Frankfurt:
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 10gbps.io London:
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 10gbps.io Paris:
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 10gbps.io Singapore:
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 10gbps.io Stockholm:
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 10gbps.io Moscow:
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

----------------------------------------------
mtr --report -w 200 --report-cycles=10 10gbps.io Miami:
HOST: hostname Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

Code:

-------------------------------------------
Check system entropy pool availability
-------------------------------------------

entropy_avail: 188
entropy_avail: 162
entropy_avail: 177
entropy_avail: 168

Code:

-------------------------------------------
OpenSSL System Benchmark
-------------------------------------------

OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -multi 24 rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc
ot: +F:3:md5:8418629.33:30296938.67:149234005.33:297115130.90:196034560.00 from 6
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Wed Mar 22 21:43:28 UTC 2017
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
md5             321136.47k  1033102.19k  2888892.70k  4929363.89k  4892336.26k
sha1            380196.92k  1036382.93k  1776693.63k  3621845.41k  3004585.60k
rc4            2952453.78k  3935167.67k  5090241.96k  4834335.38k  6206548.59k
aes-128 cbc     656298.84k   638958.87k   700803.47k   769423.71k   840752.87k
aes-256 cbc     565699.72k   575025.05k   574403.57k   560364.94k   524793.24k
sha256          174121.16k   455180.70k   920732.13k  1292092.98k  1234756.90k
                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.000240s 0.000006s   4170.2 157350.7
rsa 4096 bits 0.001498s 0.000025s    667.8  39236.9
                              sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
 256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0000s   0.0001s  43846.7  13004.7
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 24
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Wed Mar 22 21:43:28 UTC 2017
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
evp            3898720.29k  4671256.44k  5273938.89k  5110638.02k  5328542.50k
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 24
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Wed Mar 22 21:43:28 UTC 2017
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
evp            5650116.02k  5945955.91k  6316398.99k  7026708.52k  7570674.77k

LibreSSL 2.6.4
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -multi 24 rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc
+F:2:md5:9699285.33:34680554.67:137601450.67:120666112.00:163134352.48 from 6
LibreSSL 2.6.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: information not available
md5             373670.34k  1180535.48k  2476901.17k  4226904.30k  5324909.40k
sha1            435188.31k  1209619.91k  2080086.71k  2849591.85k  3106930.37k
rc4            2787000.60k  3766650.60k  4655378.72k  4110661.04k  4128823.45k
aes-128 cbc     504147.30k   637443.88k   519391.48k   629290.62k   667538.10k
aes-256 cbc     489820.10k   448787.08k   462550.69k   413536.25k   394879.50k
sha256          251621.22k   548691.10k   677211.71k   963023.20k   931374.09k
                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.000240s 0.000012s   4158.7  80827.3
rsa 4096 bits 0.003472s 0.000046s    288.1  21635.4
                              sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
 256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0000s   0.0001s  34051.6   8205.3
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 24
LibreSSL 2.6.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: information not available
evp            2332291.40k  3399534.95k  4568791.79k  4597468.61k  4414006.91k
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 24
LibreSSL 2.6.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: information not available
evp            4645382.03k  5857266.99k  5637046.34k  6339080.15k  5812246.23k
-------------------------------------------
openssl speed -evp chacha -multi 24
LibreSSL 2.6.4
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: information not available
evp            1168301.22k  1911220.82k  2216289.52k  2282500.01k  2210218.62k

Code:

-------------------------------------------
Running mysqlslap
-------------------------------------------

mysqlslap --auto-generate-sql --auto-generate-sql-add-autoincrement --auto-generate-sql-secondary-indexes=5 --number-int-cols=5 --number-char-cols=5 --number-of-queries=25000 --auto-generate-sql-unique-query-number=40 --auto-generate-sql-unique-write-number=40 --auto-generate-sql-write-number=1000 --concurrency=64 --iterations=10 --engine=myisam 
Benchmark
    Running for engine myisam
    Average number of seconds to run all queries: 1.795 seconds
    Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.556 seconds
    Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 2.065 seconds
    Number of clients running queries: 64
    Average number of queries per client: 390

Dropping the database is potentially a very bad thing to do.
Any data stored in the database will be destroyed.

Do you really want to drop the 'test' database [y/N] Database "test" dropped

Code:

-------------------------------------------
System PHP Info
-------------------------------------------

CPU: 24 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:          1024        220        803          2          0         45
Low:          1024        220        803
High:            0          0          0
-/+ buffers/cache:        175        848
Swap:            0          0          0
----------------------------------------------
PHP 7.0.26 (cli) (built: Dec 30 2017 06:03:11) ( NTS )
Copyright (c) 1997-2017 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v3.0.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2017 Zend Technologies
----------------------------------------------
Configuration File (php.ini) Path: /usr/local/lib
Loaded Configuration File:         /usr/local/lib/php.ini
Scan for additional .ini files in: /etc/centminmod/php.d
Additional .ini files parsed:      /etc/centminmod/php.d/a_customphp.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/curlcainfo.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/geoip.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/igbinary.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/imagick.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/mailparse.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/memcache.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/memcached.ini,
/etc/centminmod/php.d/redis.ini

----------------------------------------------
[PHP Modules]
bcmath
bz2
calendar
Core
ctype
curl
date
dom
enchant
exif
filter
ftp
gd
geoip
gettext
gmp
hash
iconv
igbinary
imagick
imap
intl
json
ldap
libxml
mailparse
mbstring
mcrypt
memcache
memcached
mysqli
mysqlnd
openssl
pcntl
pcre
PDO
pdo_mysql
pdo_sqlite
Phar
posix
pspell
readline
redis
Reflection
session
shmop
SimpleXML
snmp
soap
sockets
SPL
sqlite3
standard
sysvmsg
sysvsem
sysvshm
tidy
tokenizer
xml
xmlreader
xmlrpc
xmlwriter
xsl
zip
zlib

[Zend Modules]

----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Run PHP test Zend/bench.php
-------------------------------------------

simple             0.051
simplecall         0.014
simpleucall        0.045
simpleudcall       0.050
mandel             0.159
mandel2            0.179
ackermann(7)       0.042
ary(50000)         0.008
ary2(50000)        0.006
ary3(2000)         0.093
fibo(30)           0.164
hash1(50000)       0.019
hash2(500)         0.015
heapsort(20000)    0.042
matrix(20)         0.045
nestedloop(12)     0.081
sieve(30)          0.029
strcat(200000)     0.007
------------------------
Total              1.049
real: 1.15s user: 1.06s sys: 0.02s cpu: 94% maxmem: 22444 KB cswaits: 10

simple             0.051
simplecall         0.015
simpleucall        0.046
simpleudcall       0.083
mandel             0.305
mandel2            0.242
ackermann(7)       0.050
ary(50000)         0.010
ary2(50000)        0.007
ary3(2000)         0.118
fibo(30)           0.220
hash1(50000)       0.019
hash2(500)         0.015
heapsort(20000)    0.042
matrix(20)         0.057
nestedloop(12)     0.103
sieve(30)          0.035
strcat(200000)     0.007
------------------------
Total              1.424
real: 1.51s user: 1.48s sys: 0.03s cpu: 99% maxmem: 22444 KB cswaits: 1

simple             0.045
simplecall         0.014
simpleucall        0.045
simpleudcall       0.058
mandel             0.313
mandel2            0.294
ackermann(7)       0.069
ary(50000)         0.016
ary2(50000)        0.012
ary3(2000)         0.209
fibo(30)           0.193
hash1(50000)       0.021
hash2(500)         0.029
heapsort(20000)    0.058
matrix(20)         0.081
nestedloop(12)     0.119
sieve(30)          0.038
strcat(200000)     0.011
------------------------
Total              1.623
real: 1.68s user: 1.66s sys: 0.01s cpu: 99% maxmem: 22444 KB cswaits: 1

bench.php results from 3 runs
1.049
1.424
1.623

bench.php avg: 1.3653
Avg: real: 1.45s user: 1.40s sys: 0.02s cpu: 97.33% maxmem: 22444.00KB cswaits: 4.00
created results log at /home/phpbench_logs/bench_140619-122706.log
server PHP info log at /home/phpbench_logs/bench_phpinfo_140619-122706.log

-------------------------------------------
Run PHP test Zend/micro_bench.php
-------------------------------------------

empty_loop         0.069
func()             0.294    0.225
undef_func()       0.290    0.222
int_func()         0.175    0.107
$x = self::$x      0.148    0.079
self::$x = 0       0.144    0.075
isset(self::$x)    0.142    0.074
empty(self::$x)    0.198    0.129
$x = Foo::$x       0.113    0.044
Foo::$x = 0        0.109    0.041
isset(Foo::$x)     0.109    0.041
empty(Foo::$x)     0.117    0.049
self::f()          0.246    0.178
Foo::f()           0.201    0.132
$x = $this->x      0.105    0.037
$this->x = 0       0.105    0.036
$this->x += 2      0.149    0.080
++$this->x         0.105    0.037
--$this->x         0.106    0.037
$this->x++         0.124    0.056
$this->x--         0.122    0.053
isset($this->x)    0.127    0.059
empty($this->x)    0.140    0.072
$this->f()         0.192    0.123
$x = Foo::TEST     0.114    0.045
new Foo()          0.414    0.345
$x = TEST          0.112    0.044
$x = $_GET         0.149    0.081
$x = $GLOBALS['v'] 0.216    0.148
$x = $hash['v']    0.158    0.089
$x = $str[0]       0.172    0.104
$x = $a ?: null    0.114    0.046
$x = $f ?: tmp     0.120    0.051
$x = $f ? $f : $a  0.126    0.057
$x = $f ? $f : tmp 0.126    0.057
------------------------
Total              5.450
real: 5.53s user: 5.50s sys: 0.01s cpu: 99% maxmem: 16604 KB cswaits: 1

empty_loop         0.104
func()             0.405    0.301
undef_func()       0.388    0.284
int_func()         0.269    0.165
$x = self::$x      0.184    0.080
self::$x = 0       0.164    0.060
isset(self::$x)    0.161    0.057
empty(self::$x)    0.152    0.048
$x = Foo::$x       0.113    0.008
Foo::$x = 0        0.109    0.005
isset(Foo::$x)     0.109    0.004
empty(Foo::$x)     0.117    0.013
self::f()          0.246    0.142
Foo::f()           0.206    0.102
$x = $this->x      0.137    0.032
$this->x = 0       0.086    -0.018
$this->x += 2      0.126    0.022
++$this->x         0.103    -0.002
--$this->x         0.103    -0.002
$this->x++         0.125    0.021
$this->x--         0.121    0.017
isset($this->x)    0.149    0.045
empty($this->x)    0.139    0.035
$this->f()         0.193    0.089
$x = Foo::TEST     0.114    0.010
new Foo()          0.494    0.390
$x = TEST          0.092    -0.012
$x = $_GET         0.148    0.044
$x = $GLOBALS['v'] 0.212    0.108
$x = $hash['v']    0.161    0.057
$x = $str[0]       0.170    0.066
$x = $a ?: null    0.117    0.012
$x = $f ?: tmp     0.123    0.019
$x = $f ? $f : $a  0.130    0.025
$x = $f ? $f : tmp 0.150    0.045
------------------------
Total              5.923
real: 6.02s user: 5.99s sys: 0.02s cpu: 100% maxmem: 16608 KB cswaits: 1

empty_loop         0.052
func()             0.198    0.146
undef_func()       0.220    0.168
int_func()         0.157    0.106
$x = self::$x      0.148    0.096
self::$x = 0       0.144    0.092
isset(self::$x)    0.141    0.089
empty(self::$x)    0.150    0.098
$x = Foo::$x       0.112    0.061
Foo::$x = 0        0.109    0.058
isset(Foo::$x)     0.117    0.066
empty(Foo::$x)     0.125    0.073
self::f()          0.241    0.189
Foo::f()           0.225    0.173
$x = $this->x      0.106    0.054
$this->x = 0       0.086    0.035
$this->x += 2      0.139    0.087
++$this->x         0.112    0.061
--$this->x         0.111    0.059
$this->x++         0.135    0.084
$this->x--         0.148    0.096
isset($this->x)    0.138    0.086
empty($this->x)    0.151    0.099
$this->f()         0.209    0.157
$x = Foo::TEST     0.124    0.072
new Foo()          0.499    0.447
$x = TEST          0.100    0.049
$x = $_GET         0.149    0.098
$x = $GLOBALS['v'] 0.234    0.182
$x = $hash['v']    0.186    0.134
$x = $str[0]       0.170    0.118
$x = $a ?: null    0.117    0.065
$x = $f ?: tmp     0.124    0.072
$x = $f ? $f : $a  0.154    0.102
$x = $f ? $f : tmp 0.136    0.085
------------------------
Total              5.462
real: 5.51s user: 5.51s sys: 0.01s cpu: 100% maxmem: 16608 KB cswaits: 1

micro_bench.php results from 3 runs
5.450
5.923
5.462

micro_bench.php avg: 5.6117
Avg: real: 5.69s user: 5.67s sys: 0.01s cpu: 99.67% maxmem: 16606.67KB cswaits: 1.00
created results log at /home/phpbench_logs/bench_micro_140619-122706.log
server PHP info log at /home/phpbench_logs/bench_phpinfo_140619-122706.log

-------------------------------------------
centminmodbench.sh completed
-------------------------------------------

centminmodbench.sh Total Run Time: 1193.397462524 seconds

KlueMaster · Jun 14, 2019

Now, 2 things confused me here:
1.
Code:
CPU: 24 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
x86_64
Does it mean although I've been allotted only 1 vCPU, I can scale upto 24?

2. I talked to support team this morning to understand the difference between my current VPS and new double-RAM VPS that they are offering. He told me that my current plan is on HDD, while new one uses SSD. Now, I'm sure I was offered SSD at the time of purchase, so he re-verified and again said the same thing. Considering this, doesn't the I/O speed look high?

I think the person is misinformed. But, I don't trust them anymore if they can sale SSD and provision HDD instead.

eva2000 · Jun 15, 2019

Nice good to see other share their server's centminmodbench.sh benchmarks

KlueMaster said: ↑

Does it mean although I've been allotted only 1 vCPU, I can scale upto 24?
Click to expand...

that's just cpu model reported you can see how many cpus via
Code (Text):
cat /proc/cpuinfo
as to ssd vs hdd, could be hdd with ssd cache ?

buik · Jun 15, 2019

However, I thought it's a good idea to benchmark the performance so as to make a wise decision. Here are the results.
Click to expand...

Don't pin to much on benchmarks.
VPS servers are shared servers and therefore subject to whatever your (busy) neighbors do.

For example,if you take option "fresh VPS with 2GB RAM" even within the same provider.
Then the bench results can suddenly be quite different.

Because you have a big chance of coming to another node with other neighbors
(To your advantage or to your disadvantage).

That's why you should choose a good provider that doesn't oversell much.
With a good reputation.

GoDaddy's offer which is much more expensive than a new fresh VPS server is not correct.

Try to keep customers crazy with offers like that. Would mean to me; exit GoDaddy.

In addition, with an owner (now a shareholder) who shoots exotic animals for pleasure only,
you shouldn't do business anyway in the first place, on the ethical plane.

eva2000 · Jun 15, 2019

buik said: ↑

VPS servers are shared servers and therefore subject to whatever your (busy) neighbors do.
Click to expand...

Yeah though still useful when combined with server usage monitoring i.e. cpu steal % is useful to monitor too over time

KlueMaster · Jun 15, 2019

eva2000 said: ↑
Code (Text):
cat /proc/cpuinfo
Click to expand...
Produces similar processor info 24 times. Looks like I'm on a server without much load, but constrained by RAM.

GoDaay is simply No Go from now. Now have to decide between Linode and SSDNodes. Since, none of my sites are critical, so I think SSDNodes's cheaper offering would be OK.

What would you recommend between two annual plans of SSDNodes: RAID10 [email protected]$10/mo and RAID [email protected]$14/mo?
Both are offering 16GB RAM and 80GB storage with 4vCPU.

eva2000 · Jun 15, 2019

looks like shared cpu utilisation on your VPS plans but they would artificially limit you to that 1 cpu utilisation I suppose.

ssdnodes NVMe just to get guarantee'd Intel Xeon Scalable Skylake cpus as non-NVMe have possibility of older Intel Xeon E5 series

Log in / Register

Forums

Discover Centmin Mod today

Benchmarks GoDaddy Cheap VPS Benchmark

KlueMaster Member

KlueMaster Member

eva2000 Administrator Staff Member

buik Well-Known Member

eva2000 Administrator Staff Member

KlueMaster Member

eva2000 Administrator Staff Member

.

Log in / Register

Useful Searches

Discover Centmin Mod today

Benchmarks GoDaddy Cheap VPS Benchmark

KlueMaster Member

KlueMaster Member

eva2000 Administrator Staff Member

buik Well-Known Member

eva2000 Administrator Staff Member

KlueMaster Member

eva2000 Administrator Staff Member

.